Interesting article (but kind of long).  Good description below.

infoneer-pulse:

austinkleon:

Great article. Bottom line: there will always be gatekeepers, and the more and more books that get published, the more readers will look to gatekeepers to tell them what to read.

we’ll still wind up with a literary marketplace in which a handful of blockbuster names capture most of the sales and attention, personal connections are milked for professional success, and relatively few authoritative voices have the power to lift some artists into the spotlight while others languish in obscurity. Writers who are charming in person and happy to promote themselves and interact with fans will prosper, while antisocial geniuses may fail. (It’s unsettling to wonder how the Salingers, Pynchons, Naipauls and David Foster Wallaces of tomorrow will fare in a world where social networking and glad-handing are de rigueur. Why should extroversion be required of a great novelist?) The result: not a whole lot better than the system we already have, but also (hopefully) not much worse.

23 notes:

  1. jchiappa reblogged this from infoneer-pulse and added:
    Interesting article (but kind of long). Good description below.
  2. infoneer-pulse reblogged this from austinkleon
  3. sanityscraps reblogged this from austinkleon
  4. jumbleofnotes reblogged this from austinkleon
  5. tallandignorantservants said: Not only are you a great artist, you’re also popping amazingly relevant articles onto my dashboard! Austin Rhymes-With-Neon, you rock.
  6. austinkleon posted this
  archive